Where is the line between dedicated commitment and illegal behavior in the workplace? The German Working Time Act sets clear boundaries to protect employees. In our blog article, we examine legal provisions, explain possible penalties for violations, and provide practical tips on how both employees and employers can comply with regulations and protect themselves against working time fraud.
Where violations actually occur in everyday work
Legal boundaries are clearly defined. Yet violations frequently occur in day-to-day operations.
Typical situations in project-based companies:
1. Project peaks & deadlines
A client escalates, a deadline approaches, employees stay "just today" a bit longer. 10 hours become 11 or 12. Rest periods are unknowingly violated.
2. Remote work & trust-based working hours
The laptop gets opened again in the evening. Slack messages or quick check-ins count as working time but are often not documented.
3. Meetings without break windows
Calendars are packed. Breaks are postponed or forgotten entirely, even though they are legally required.
4. Business travel
Uncertainty about whether travel time counts as working time leads to incorrect documentation.
5. Lack of systematic time tracking
Hours are entered retroactively or estimated. This inadvertently creates violations of documentation obligations.
Current requirements: How must working hours be recorded?
According to the German Working Time Act, working hours must be recorded precisely and reliably to ensure compliance with legal regulations. In particular, Section 16(2) ArbZG stipulates that the employer is obligated to record working hours that exceed the regular daily working time and to retain these records for at least two years. This documentation requirement serves to protect employees and enable review by supervisory authorities.
Ready for legally compliant time tracking?
Start today -- free for 14 days, no credit card required.
Fines: What do violations of the Working Time Act cost?
Accurate project time tracking is not only good business practice but also a judicial and, in some cases, collectively agreed requirement in Germany. Companies that violate the Working Time Act expose themselves to the risk of fines and other consequences.
Excerpt from the fine catalog
Working Time Act violations are frequently treated as administrative offenses and can be penalized with fines of up to EUR 30,000 per violation. These fines can be imposed on both the company and the responsible manager personally. The exact amount of the fine is at the discretion of the supervisory authority responsible under state law (e.g., district government, trade supervisory office). The current fine catalog, published by the State Committee for Occupational Safety and Technical Safety (LASI), provides guidance.
The 5 most common violations and their fines:
Even though individual fines may initially seem manageable, they can quickly add up to five- or six-figure amounts even in smaller companies. This is because the statute of limitations is two years and the supervisory authority can review the working time records of all employees for the past 24 months to penalize all identified violations accordingly. Additionally, repeated and intentional violations that endanger an employee's health can be prosecuted criminally. These can result in prison sentences of up to one year or monetary penalties.
Reputational damage
Companies that violate time tracking regulations risk their reputation and credibility. This can lead to a loss of trust among clients, business partners, and employees, with long-term negative consequences. Violations of occupational safety laws quickly lead to negative media coverage, as with an Amazon subcontractor in 2021 who was criticized on the German ZDF program "Frontal." Amazon filed criminal charges at the time after the subcontractor exploited its employees, resulting in barely livable wages, work pressure, unpaid overtime, and disregard for statutory rest periods.
Violation of the Working Time Act: What rules must be followed?
Violations of working time regulations are no trivial matter -- on the contrary. They affect employee health and can cause high costs in serious cases. The saying "ignorance is no excuse" applies especially to working time. Since the Working Time Act is designed to ensure employee health protection, the responsibility for compliance lies with the employer.
Break time
It is not only your body that signals when it is high time for a break -- the legislator also has strict rules about when a break MUST be taken. This is regulated in Section 4 of the Working Time Act.
After six hours at the latest, the legislator requires a rest break.
Maximum working hours
Imagine an employee unexpectedly calls in sick while a critical complaint needs to be handled and an important client inquiry comes in. Another employee stays as the last person in the office after a 12-hour day to take care of everything. This is a classic violation of the Working Time Act. The following limits apply to maximum working hours:
Rest periods
There are different views on whether you live to work or work to live. But when it comes to the legally mandated rest period, there is no room for discussion: At least 11 hours must pass between the end of one working day and the start of the next -- including in the following situations:
A phone call after a business dinner counts as working time, and the 11-hour rest period starts afterward.
Business dinners count as working time if they are part of the job duties or were ordered by management.
Even when working from home, the legal regulations regarding rest periods must be observed.
Practical tip for managers:
Especially in project-oriented companies, violations often arise not from overtime itself but from communication culture.
A simple rule helps:
No mandatory calls or meetings after work hours without subsequently adjusting the rest period.
Digital systems with automatic rest period validation significantly reduce this risk without additional administrative effort.
Sundays and public holidays
The Working Time Act establishes a general prohibition on employment on Sundays and public holidays, with exceptions for certain professions and emergencies. Employees who must nevertheless work on these days are entitled to at least 15 free Sundays per year. Special permits can be applied for regarding Sunday and public holiday work, but compensatory rest days must be granted, typically within two weeks for Sundays and within eight weeks for public holidays.
However, it is possible to apply to the responsible supervisory authority for a special permit to work on these days. These include:
A maximum of 10 Sundays and public holidays per year in retail for open shopping Sundays.
One Sunday per year for conducting the legally required inventory.
A maximum of 5 Sundays and public holidays per year to prevent disproportionate damage, whereby the damage must be substantial and working on these days must be justified. This could, for example, be an imminent production shutdown due to unexpected repairs.
Special cases: What exceptions exist?
Exceptions prove the rule, including when it comes to working time:
Business travel:
The assessment of whether travel time counts as working time depends on the mode of transportation used and how employees may or must spend their time during the journey. For air or rail travel, travel time counts as working time if employees are expected to work. However, if they are free to use the time for rest or personal activities, it is considered free time. In the case of car trips to clients, driving time counts as working time for the driver, while the passenger typically has free time.
Secondary employment:
When employees work for another employer on the side or are self-employed as a secondary occupation, both the maximum permissible working hours and the 11-hour rest period apply in total. The Working Time Act primarily focuses on dependent employment, but operating one's own business is generally permitted as long as it does not compete with the primary employer. However, excessive self-employment may be impermissible, particularly if it leads to fatigue and impairs the fulfillment of employment obligations with the primary employer.
Special employee groups:
Note: Special provisions and working time restrictions may apply to particularly vulnerable groups such as pregnant and nursing women, minors under 18, and severely disabled persons. These particularly concern the permissible maximum working hours, overtime, and work on Sundays and public holidays.
Implement the Working Time Act in 7 pragmatic steps
Legal compliance does not have to be a bureaucratic nightmare. With clear routines, the topic can be integrated seamlessly.
1. Define responsibility
Determine who monitors compliance (HR, team lead, management).
2. Establish minimum requirements
The following must be recorded:
Start of work
End of work
Breaks
Project-related booking (if applicable)
Anything beyond that is optional.
3. Automated alerts instead of manual checks
Warnings for:
10-hour limit
Missing breaks
Falling below the 11-hour rest period
This way, you support rather than "control."
4. Weekly quick check (3 minutes)
Friday: Each manager reviews anomalies in their team.
5. Clear definition: What counts as working time?
E.g., calls after business dinners, client phone calls in the evening, business travel time.
6. Store documentation in an audit-proof manner (2 years)
Traceability is crucial.
7. Define an escalation path
Alert -> Conversation -> Resource adjustment -> No sanctions without context.
When is time tracking particularly important? 3 examples
The importance of precise time tracking extends across various areas, from the awarding of public contracts to client billing and compliance with labor law provisions. Particularly in industries where public funds are involved or hourly billing is standard, accurate time tracking is essential to avoid contractual penalties and maintain client trust.
Public contracts
When awarding public contracts, strict requirements are often placed on project time tracking. The contracting authorities require detailed records to ensure that contractual obligations are met and public funds are used correctly. Failure to meet these requirements can lead to contractual penalties or even exclusion from future contracts.
Client billing
If you bill clients by the hour, it is essential to track project time accurately. Errors or irregularities in project time tracking can lead to a loss of trust among your clients and call the financial integrity of your company into question. Additionally, disputes about services rendered and payment defaults can arise. Time reports that can be sent regularly during the project provide a remedy. In the invoice appendix, all hours worked are then itemized in detail.
Labor law provisions
At the latest with the Federal Labor Court ruling and the subsequent draft bill by the Federal Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, time tracking has also become mandatory in Germany. Additionally, in some industries, working conditions are regulated through collective agreements. These may contain specific requirements for project time tracking to ensure that working hours and compensation are correctly recorded, particularly in skilled trades, healthcare, or retail.
Unless otherwise regulated in collective agreements or works/service agreements, the following applies: Working time must be documented (electronically). Companies with up to 10 employees are exempt from the electronic recording requirement according to the draft bill by the Federal Ministry of Labor, but must still record their hours in another form.
Prevent working time fraud and rule violations
Time tracking must not feel like surveillance.
That is why three principles are crucial:
1. Transparency instead of surveillance
Employees can see for themselves when limits are being exceeded.
2. Automatic plausibility checks
Missing breaks or excessively long working days are detected by the system.
3. Communicate the protective function
Time tracking serves health protection, not performance measurement.
This is how compliance without frustration is achieved.
Implement working time compliance systematically with ZEP
Are you still relying on manual methods for project time tracking? Then errors and inaccuracies are practically inevitable. To avoid violations of the Working Time Act, precise and legally compliant time tracking with a tool like ZEP is essential.
Automatic limit checking
ZEP detects violations of the 10-hour limit or missing rest periods in real time.
Audit-proof documentation
All working hours are stored in a tamper-proof format, including 2-year retention.
Project and working time combined
You not only fulfill legal obligations but also improve your billing accuracy at the same time.
Fewer manual errors
Digital time clock instead of Excel or paper timesheets.
Result:
Legal compliance becomes part of your operational project controlling.
Conclusion
Working time compliance is not purely an HR topic. It affects project planning, resource management, billing, and business risks equally.
Those who systematically track working hours not only reduce fines but also gain transparency over workload, profitability, and operational stability.
If you want to assess how compliance-ready your company currently is, start with a structured system instead of manual lists.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who is liable for violations of the Working Time Act? The managing director or the company?
The employer is fundamentally responsible for compliance with the Working Time Act. In corporations, this obligation regularly falls on the management. This means that not only the company itself can be fined, but under certain circumstances, authorized representatives can also be held personally liable. Internal delegation to HR or team leads does not automatically release management from its organizational responsibility. What matters is whether a functioning control system has been established and compliance with legal requirements is verifiably monitored. If such a structure is lacking, this can lead to personal fines or, in cases of intentional endangerment, even criminal consequences.
Does travel time count as working time under the Working Time Act?
Whether travel time counts as working time depends heavily on the specific context. If the journey is made at the employer's instruction and serves to fulfill employment obligations, there are strong arguments for counting it as working time. Particularly when active work is performed during the journey, such as driving a vehicle, working time is regularly the case. For passive travel times, for example during a train ride without work being performed, the assessment is more nuanced. For compliance with maximum working hours and rest periods, what matters is whether there is an actual work obligation and how the journey is organizationally integrated. In project-oriented companies, inadvertent violations frequently occur here, especially when long travel days are not correctly factored into total working time.
How do the ECJ and Federal Labor Court rulings on time tracking concretely affect companies?
Through the ruling of the European Court of Justice and the subsequent decision of the Federal Labor Court, employers are required to provide an objective, reliable, and accessible system for recording working time. This clarifies that the complete daily working time must be documented. Trust-based working hours do not exempt from this obligation. Even though final legislative specification is still pending, the obligation effectively already exists today. Companies that continue to rely on purely manual or incomplete tracking are operating in a legal risk zone. Particularly in knowledge-intensive industries with flexible work models, a digital and systematic solution is required to ensure transparency and legal certainty.
Does the Working Time Act also apply to managers and senior executives?
The Working Time Act fundamentally also applies to managers, unless they meet the narrow requirements of a senior executive within the meaning of the Works Constitution Act. This threshold is higher than many companies assume. Not every manager with personnel responsibility automatically falls outside the scope of the law. Only those who independently make key business decisions or have significant influence on company management may fall under the exception. In practice, this only affects a small group of people. For the majority of team leaders and department heads, the regular working time limits, including maximum working hours and rest periods, continue to apply.
What consequences result from systematic disregard of rest periods?
The legally mandated minimum rest period of eleven hours serves health protection and must be observed. If it is regularly violated, fines per hour started can be imposed. Additionally, increased inspections by supervisory authorities may follow, particularly if there are indications of structural deficiencies. If fatigued employees are involved in workplace accidents or health impairments, the liability risk increases significantly. In severe cases, an administrative offense can become a criminal offense if health was intentionally or negligently endangered. Particularly in digitally-driven work environments, violations frequently arise from evening communications or short-notice meetings that are not planned as working time.
How can working time compliance be ensured without creating a culture of distrust?
Time tracking is often equated with control, but it actually primarily serves a protective function. The key is the manner of implementation. When employees gain transparency over their own working hours and are alerted by the system to threshold violations, support is created instead of surveillance. A clear definition of what counts as working time provides guidance and reduces daily uncertainties. When time tracking is also integrated into existing project and controlling processes, companies benefit doubly. They fulfill legal requirements while simultaneously gaining reliable data on workload, resource planning, and profitability. This way, working time compliance becomes a component of professional business management rather than an instrument of distrust.